Discovering Frameworks for Politics
This investigation has produced two dynamic frameworks in the form of THEE-Trees. The first deals with what determines political choice, and it generated a second framework which represents how political life is handled in a society. Other powerful comprehensive frameworks have been identified along the way. On a provisional basis, names have been assigned and significant properties have been specified
It was proposed that the origins of emerges from WILL, the Root of THEE. This webpage shows the inquiry-process that led to discovering the various frameworks.
could be found in whichSteps in the Discovery Process
STEP 1: A Spiral ( ) develops from an organization of the ( ) in a Typology Essentials Table as shown below:
Better viewing: Use browser zoom if needed.
The ordering of the Spiral of . The re-ordering is shown underneath the Spiral diagram.
in the left-hand Table in the above diagram is changed in forming theSTEP 2. The new order could then be viewed as a holistic hierarchy i.e. Mode-1 to Mode-7 becomes Level-1 to Level-7; and a Tree was formed by applying the dynamic duality, social v private. The Tree is provisionally named: and it depicts the relations and influences between and amongst the people and the powerful in society.
Better viewing: Use browser zoom if needed.
STEP 3. This Tree, being holistic, enables the development of a structural hierarchy by progressive combination of adjacent Levels in the —as shown in the diagram below. You can see that the Monads contain the originating Tree. The names of the Monads are slightly altered to fit the new context.
STEP 4. The structural hierarchy is itself holistic—each of its Groupings/Levels implies and progressively generates higher (or lower) Groupings/Levels. Nothing in political life exists prior to and nothing is possible beyond . It is therefore possible to create a by applying the appropriate dynamic duality, which is: integrative v divisive.
In the diagram below, the structural hierarchy is turned on its side to show schematically how each Grouping becomes a hierarchical Level. (The Level spacings are distorted by the differing numbers of Groups in each Grouping, so they do not appear to align with the TreeLevels.) The Tree is a generalized image using S (Social) v P (Personal) as duality.
These are the frameworks for legitimating politics. On the left is the framework containing relevant activities and institutions; and on the right is a dynamic representation of how change occurs in practice.
i.e.
|
Originally posted: August-2009; Last updated: 15-Nov-2010. Amended 17-Nov-2023.